In 2023 Slashdot covered a battery-swapping startup that promised to give EVs a full charge in about the same time it takes to fill a tank of gas.

They just filed for bankruptcy, reports Inc:

Ample was founded in 2014 with a goal of “solving slow charging times and infrastructure incompatibility” for commercial EV fleets such as those in logistics, ride-hailing, and delivery, the filing states. To-date, Ample has raised more than $330 million across five rounds of funding to finance research and development and deployment. Rather than tackling fast charging, its strategy involved developing “fully autonomous modular battery swapping,” capable of delivering a fully charged battery in just five minutes. The technology requires purpose-built “Ample stations” that look a little like carwashes. A car is guided into the bay and elevated on a platform. A robot then identifies the location of a car’s battery module, removes it, and replaces it with a charged module, Canary Media reported.

The company also boasts partnerships with Uber, Mitsubishi, and Stellantis, and notes it has deployed its technology — or is pursuing deployment — in San Francisco, Madrid and Tokyo. Even so, it ran up against funding issues. In its filing, Ample attributed its bankruptcy to macroeconomic and industry headwinds, such as “severe supply chain disruptions,” “contraction in both public and private investment in renewable energy” and the “reduction, delay, or redirection of government incentives intended to accelerate EV adoption.” The filing notes that regulatory and permitting delays slowed its launch in international markets, after which access to capital foiled its scaling efforts. The company eliminated all but two full-time, non-executive employees after formerly employing about 200…

Electrek noted that Ample is the second battery swapping startup to go bankrupt after California-based Better Place in collapsed in 2013 amid financial issues related to how capital intensive it was to build infrastructure, Reuters reported. And Tesla briefly pursued the concept, building a station in California, before ditching the idea altogether.

Ample “claimed to have designed autonomous battery swapping stations that would be rapidly deployable, cheap to build, and could adapt to any EV design with a modular battery which would be easy for manufacturers to use,” notes Electrek’s article:

Where this bankruptcy leaves Ample’s technology is unclear. Another company could snap it up and try to do something with it, if they find that the technology is real and useful. Ample had gotten investments and partnerships with Shell, Mitsubishi and Stellantis, for example, so the company wasn’t alone in touting its tech. Or, it could just disappear, as other EV battery swapping plans have before…

That’s not to say that nobody has been successful at at implementing battery swap, though. NIO seems to be successful with its battery swapping tech in China, though the company did miss its 2025 scaling goals by a longshot. But as of yet, this is the only notable example of a successful battery swap initiative, and it was done by an automaker itself, rather than a startup claiming to work for every automaker.

Electrek’s writer is “just not bullish on battery swapping as a solution in general. Currently, the fastest-charging vehicles can charge from 10-80% in about 18 minutes. While that’s longer than 5 minutes, it’s not really a terrible amount of time to spend during most stops.”

Plus, if cars come and go in 5 minutes instead of 18 minutes, “then you’re going to have more than triple the throughput at peak utilization.” And Ample’s prices would be about the same as normal EV quick-charging prices…

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

If you still haven’t bought into the Steam Deck craze, it’ll cost you a little extra to take the plunge now since Valve is only offering OLED models. Valve announced in a note on its Steam Deck page that it’s “no longer producing the Steam Deck LCD 256GB model,” adding that “once sold out, it will no longer be available.” As of this article’s publishing, the $399 Steam Deck with LCD and 256 GB of storage, which we ranked as the best gaming handheld for most, is out of stock. Even Valve’s refurbished stock of LCD models has been cleared out.

The OLED version of the Steam Deck is a worthy upgrade since it comes with a longer battery life and a larger display with a higher refresh rate. However, the LCD model offered an impressive entry price for the Steam Deck and the world of affordable gaming handhelds. Fortunately for existing owners, Valve said it plans to continue supporting the LCD models with future software updates.

For now, potential buyers will have to choose between the new entry-level pricing of $549 for the OLED model with 512GB of storage or upgrading to 1TB and paying at least $649. Valve’s choice to discontinue its last remaining LCD model isn’t surprising after it did the same with the 512GB version and the 64GB option that was available when the Steam Deck was first released in 2022.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gaming/valve-discontinued-the-last-remaining-lcd-model-of-the-steam-deck-171548195.html?src=rss

“Super PAC aims to drown out AI critics in midterms,” the Washington Post reported in August, noting its intial funding over $100 million from “some of Silicon Valley’s most powerful investors and executives” including OpenAI president Greg Brockman, his wife, and VC firm Andreessen Horowitz. The group’s goal was “to quash a philosophical debate that has divided the tech industry on the risk of artificial intelligence overpowering humanity,” according to the article — and to support “pro-AI” candidates in America’s next election in November of 2026 and “oppose candidates perceived as slowing down AI development.”

Their first target? State assemblyman Alex Bores, now running to be a U.S. representative. While in the state legislature Bores sponsored a bill that would “require large AI companies to publish safety data on their technology,” notes the Washington Post. So the attack ad charges that Bores “wants Albany bureaucrats regulating AI,” excoriating him for sponsoring a bill that “hands AI to state regulators and creates a chaotic patchwork of state rules that would crush innovation, cost New York jobs, and fail to keep people safe! And he’s backed by groups funded by convicted felon Sam Bankman-Fried. Is that really who should be shaping AI safety for our kids? America needs one smart national policy that sets clear stands for safe AI not Albany politicians like Alex Bores.”

The Post calls it “the opening skirmish in a battle set to play out across the country” as tech moguls (and an independent effort receiving “tens of millions” from Meta) “try to use the 2026 midterms to reengineer Congress and state legislatures in favor of their ambitions for artificial intelligence” and “to wrest control of the narrative around AI, just as politicians in both parties have started warning that the industry is moving too fast.”

By knocking down candidates such as Bores, who favor regulations, and boosting industry sympathizers, the tech-backed groups could signal to incumbents and candidates nationwide that opposing the tech industry can jeopardize their electoral chances. “Bores just happened to be first, but he’s not the last, and he’s certainly not the only,” said Josh Vlasto, co-head of Leading the Future, the bipartisan super PAC behind the ad.

The group plans to support and oppose candidates in congressional and state elections next year. It will also fund rapid response operations against voices in the industry pushing for more oversight… The strategy aims to replicate the success of the cryptocurrency industry, which used a super PAC to clear a path for Congress this summer to boost the sector’s fortunes with the passage of the Genius Act… But signs that voters are increasingly wary of AI suggest that approach may be challenging to replicate. More than half of Americans believe AI poses a high risk to society, Pew Research Center found in a June survey. As AI usage continues to grow, more people are being warned by chief executives that AI will disrupt their jobs, seeing power-hungry data centers spring up in their towns or hearing claims that chatbots can harm mental health.

The article also notes there’s at least two other groups seeking to counter this pro-AI push, raising money through a nonprofit called “Public First.”

CNN calls the new pro-AI ads “a likely preview of the vast amounts of money the technology industry could spend ahead of next year’s elections,” noting that the ads are first targeting the candidate-choosing primary elections

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Google wanted to remove Assistant from most Android phones by the end of 2025 and replace it with Gemini. But now the company has announced that it needs a bit more time to make its AI assistant the new default digital helper for most of its users. Google said that it’s adjusting its previously announced timeline to “make sure [it delivers] a seamless transition” and that updates to convert Assistant to Gemini on Android devices will continue into the next year. The company also said that it’s sharing more details in the “coming months,” so it’s possible that the transition will go past early 2026.

Assistant’s retirement was pretty much expected the moment Google launched Gemini and started giving it Assistant’s capabilities, such as the ability to control smart devices connected to your phone. It launched the Pixel 9 Series with Gemini as the default assistant back in 2024. The company has also been putting Gemini in all of its products and previously said that it plans to upgrade all “tablets, cars and devices that connect to your phone, such as headphones and watches” with the AI-powered chatbot. Devices do have to meet a few minimum requirements to get the upgrade, however, and must be running Android 10 and come with 2GB of RAM at the very least.

This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/google-assistant-will-stick-around-a-bit-longer-than-expected-for-some-android-users-130000178.html?src=rss

For people living in the European Union, the price of their next car, home renovation, and even local produce may soon reflect a climate policy that many have never even heard of. This new regulation, which comes fully into force on New Year’s Day, does not just target heavy industry—it affects everyday goods which now face an added carbon cost when they enter Europe.

The carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) puts a carbon price on many imported goods—meaning that EU-based importers will pay for the greenhouse gases emitted during the production of certain carbon-intensive materials.

If goods come from countries with weaker climate rules, then the charge will be higher. To sell to the EU, producers will effectively need to show their goods aren’t too carbon-intensive.

Read full article

Comments